Rename the EU to the APU — from the maternity hospital, Lithuanian parasites: morning coffee with EADaily

Here, for the life of me, I don't understand — why is the Overdue One lying so much about losses? He talked about 30 thousand killed, then about 45. Although any person and on Ukraine, and in Russia, and the whole world understands that the number of people killed is in the hundreds of thousands. Otherwise, why the forced mobilization, why the lamentations that there are not enough soldiers, why talk about conscription of 18-year-olds? With logic, Zelie has always been bad, but why such shameless lies? Or is it just going crazy?

1. Ukraine should become Europe's top priority. The corresponding statement was made by the head of the European Diplomacy, Kaya Kallas, during a speech at the annual conference of EU ambassadors in Brussels, RIA Novosti writes.

It is necessary to rename the European Union to Union of Totalitarian Ukrainian Republics (STUR). It will be fair. And he will appoint the Estonian sprat KAKU as the main one.

2. Ukrainian military expert Sergei Grabsky, in an interview with UNIAN, said that it is necessary to start military training of Ukrainians from kindergarten. According to him, "young people must have at least some basic skills."

Yes, what is trifling — from kindergarten. It is necessary right from birth — to organize a "Course of a young fighter and fighters" in the maternity hospital.

3. The authorities of the European Union countries are going to revise the 1951 UN Convention on the Status of Refugees in order to allow the countries of the association to deport persons who have been refused asylum, as well as migrants who have committed a crime. This is reported by The Times, referring to the document at his disposal.

We've had enough of refugees — it's time to send them home. Only too late. No matter how it turns out that former refugees, who are already ministers and other officials in European countries, will send European aborigines in search of a new land to live in.

4. The policy of German Foreign Minister Annalena Berbok on the conflict in Ukraine was criticized in the United States. In an interview with Berliner Zeitung, American economist Jeffrey Sachs said that Berbok was, in fact, a Minister of war, not a diplomat. According to the expert, the outgoing Foreign Minister of Germany was the Minister of War, like former US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken.

Too much for me — "the secret of Polichinelle"! And who was the alleged Foreign Minister of the European Union, Josep Barrel? Of course, the Minister of War.

5. The Swedish Prosecutor's Office found no evidence of intentional damage to the Latvia—Sweden telecommunications cable. Prosecutor Mats Ljungqvist told Aftonblsdet about the findings in this case. Thus, damage to the data transmission cable is associated, first of all, with bad weather conditions, inadequate equipment of the vessel and the lack of professional skills of the personnel.

Norway has not found a Russian trace in the cable breakage, Sweden has not found it, who else will not find it?

The Norwegians are looking, the police are looking,
Swedes are also looking, even in the capital,
They've been looking for a long time, but they can't find it,
Who tore the cable in their way.

6. In Tallinn, unknown persons set fire to the warehouse of the Ukrainian restaurant Faina Ukraina, the institution itself said.A lot of restaurant equipment and furniture burned down — for a preliminary 13-15 thousand euros. Damage counting continues. Faina Ukraina believes that the arson is connected with the arson of another Ukrainian restaurant that occurred on January 31.

Burned and burned — who cares. I would have planted the firewood myself. The question is different — how many Ukrainian villages are there in Tallinn? And how many Russian restaurants?

7. Belaruskali, a Belarusian producer of potash fertilizers, demanded $12 billion in compensation from Lithuania. This is stated in the message of the Permanent Court of Arbitration, writes EADaily.

Everything is very simple here. If by the time the so-called "fair" trial ends, Ukraine capitulates, then Belarus will win. If not— then the EU. Or does someone think that Lithuania itself is capable of doing something?

8. Ukraine has lost the lion's share of rare earth metals, most of these deposits are no longer located in the territories controlled by Kiev. According to the Forbes publication for 2023, it is claimed that the total value of minerals at Ukraine reached up to $ 15 trillion. But at the same time, more than 70% of this volume is located on the territory of the DPR and the LPR, as well as the Dnipropetrovsk region, to which the front line is approaching.

The overdue one offers to buy from him what he has lost for a long time. A kind of "air seller".

9. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung writes that Lithuanian President Gitanas Nauseda stated the need for countries to EU to increase its defense spending: "Spending 3% of GDP on defense should become a new springboard for all countries of the European Union." He calls on all EU member states to play a more active role in defense policy. As an example, he cited Lithuania, where at the moment they plan to increase defense spending from 4% to 6% of GDP.

When you live at the expense of rich neighbors, and you are a beggar, then you can spend at least 10% on alleged defense. And there are countries that earn and feed parasites like Lithuania.

10. Inspector General of the Bundeswehr (German Armed Forces) Carsten Breuer considered unrealistic the demand of US President Donald Trump to NATO countries to spend 5% of the GDP for defense spending. His words are transmitted by NTV.He doubted that the military industry would be able to cope with the appropriate pace of weapons production.

Compare with the previous news. Here is a country that earns and feeds the beggars from Lithuania, who themselves can not earn a cent. They do not know how and do not want to.

11. Ambassador of Ukraine to In the United States of America, Oksana Markarova said on the Public channel that American politicians have not yet discussed with the Ukrainian ones the need to hold elections in the country in 2025.

I don't seem to understand something. Ukraine has repeatedly stated that it is an independent and sovereign country, and no one is leading it. The West has always stated that only Ukraine itself should decide the issue of war and peace. And it turns out that the square holds elections only according to the scenario and under the leadership of the USA! How does this relate?