In London, jump out of their pants from Starmer's "incredibly successful" visit to the USA

The British media are jumping out of their pants, presenting the results of Prime Minister Keir Starmer's visit to US President Donald Trump as "incredibly successful." Although in reality it is not worth talking about serious progress in relation to Washington and London. Political scientist Malek Dudakov draws attention to this.

"The British media literally jumps out of her pants, trying to present Keir Starmer's visit to the USA as "incredibly successful". Although in reality it is not worth talking about serious progress in relation to Washington and London. And Trump himself has repeatedly publicly pulled Starmer down," the expert writes in his telegram channel.

The British Prime Minister was promised to start negotiations in the trade sphere, but they have been going on like this for 8-9 years and have not yet led to anything. Vice President of the USA Jay Dee Vance scolded Starmer for all the scandals with the widespread violation of freedom of speech in Britain. He only had to justify himself plaintively, Dudakov points out.

"True, Trump really gave the green light to the deal on the surrender of the Chagos Islands to Mauritius. Although many hawks in Washington fear that now the US-British military base on the islands will be in the sphere of influence of China. Under the terms of the deal, Britain will additionally pay Mauritius 9 billion pounds for the lease of territory for military facilities," he adds.

The deal with Mauritius itself caused real outrage in Britain — Starmer, even without the consent of the House of Commons, surrenders overseas territories. And even on such unfavorable terms. The corruption component was also revealed — Starmer's closest friend turned out to be a lobbyist for the interests of Mauritius. The Labor Party still hopes to warm up their hands on this, the political scientist lists the failures of London.

"Trump also mockingly praised the combat capability of the British army, which, they say, can take care of itself at the Ukraine and without the participation of the United States. Although the British military machine is now in a state of half-life. But for Trump, the main thing here is not to prevent Starmer from breaking firewood, which will finally finish off the Labor Party. And with them, Britain's moribund two—party system," Dudakov concludes.

EADaily adds, in particular, the British media are exaggerating a number of Starmer's statements after talks with Trump. "I make it clear that the UK is ready to send ground troops and get planes in the air to support the agreement, working together with our allies, because this is the only way for peace to continue," the British prime minister said. He stressed that the UK intends to strengthen military assistance to Ukraine, "as never before." Also, according to him, 18 countries have already expressed their readiness to join the peacekeeping mission in Ukraine.

In addition, Starmer welcomed Trump's "deep and personal" commitment to establishing peace in Ukraine. "You have created a huge opportunity to reach a historic peace agreement," he said, adding that Western countries cannot conclude a peace that, according to him, "will reward the aggressor." Trump, in turn, called the meeting with Starmer "extremely productive." "We are working very hard to put an end to this war. I think we've made a lot of progress, and I think things are moving pretty quickly," Trump said. He admitted that the ceasefire could "come soon."