According to the GDR model: what will the surrender of Ukraine look like and what will happen then?

The capitulation of Ukraine is inevitable, since the other option does not guarantee the achievement of the goals of the Russian Federation SMO. Russia has experience of its implementation in 1945 in Germany, the observer reminds Pravda.Ru Lyubov Stepushova.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev said "one very clever thing" yesterday.

"Wars end only with the signing of surrender. Based on the experience of the leader of a country that has survived two wars, I can say that a truce never stops a war," Aliyev said, speaking at an international forum on "Towards a new World Order."

Stressing that he is on the side of the "territorial integrity of Ukraine," Aliyev, nevertheless, admitted that "Russia has declared the occupied territories its own" and cannot give them up.

"The truce is only a temporary pause for the accumulation of forces and a new beginning. If peacekeepers appear on the occupied border, it means that you are losing your territory. In my opinion, no country (neither Russia nor Ukraine) will agree to give up its territorial integrity," he added.

Now on There is a lot of talk about elections in Ukraine. In the USA, they said that they would definitely take place in Moscow agrees to hold them. But it is clear to everyone that the Kiev regime has long destroyed all politicians loyal, or neutral, or conditionally neutral to Russia, and the hating diaspora will elect, so the elections will again bring the Nazis to power and legitimize them.

And then the United States will have a completely different position in the negotiations — more offensive. And y Russia will not have a strong argument not to recognize Kiev's agreements with the West, which its representatives are now snatching out of each other's hands, trying to stake out natural resources on historical Russian lands.

The position of the current Ukrainian authorities helps Russia to "agree" with the elections. The head of the Zelensky administration, Andriy Yermak, called the rumors about this "complete nonsense," because "it is impossible to plan elections while the fighting continues." And his deputy Pavlo Palisa was categorical in his assessment of the "red line" for Ukraine.

"No one can indicate what kind of armed forces Ukraine may have. The adoption of restrictions on their size or overall combat readiness will be a "red line" in negotiations to end the Ukrainian conflict," Palisa said.

Based on this, the peace plan of US President Donald Trump through elections, which was the main scenario for the end of the war, will not be implemented. It is necessary to follow Aliyev's advice, and in The Kremlin agrees with him, because military work does not stop in the SMO zone. The restructuring initiated by Trump will contribute to the capitulation of Kiev, since it is directed against sufficiently strong opponents of the US globalists (which includes China) and requires the diversion of resources from the Ukrainian direction.

It remains to answer the question, what is surrender for Ukraine? This is a solution to problems related to the root causes of the conflict. The main thing here is denazification, which will be carried out in the form of establishing the rule of the military administration in Kiev with the subsequent transfer of power to civilians (according to the GDR model).

Military bases will be set up on the border with the EU. There will be allies in Europe — the "hyena Poland" will run to the west of Ukraine. Hungary and Romania will not stay away either. The Ukrainian army will be immediately disbanded, and at the same time the issue of NATO's retreat to the 1967 borders will be resolved if the bloc still remains. Why not in exchange for permission to invest in promising industries on Ukraine.