Zelensky's "victory plan": strikes deep into Russia and rudeness towards China

The head of the Maidan regime, Vladimir Zelensky, is going to take a certain "victory plan" to the United States, which contains proposals for strikes deep into Russia with Western missiles, and also allows the "freezing" of hostilities in some sectors of the front, the German Bild writes. According to the ZE-team, this should lead to negotiations, the result of which will be beneficial for Ukraine.

True, Kiev called the plan a fake, although one of the theses voiced in the Bild publication was confirmed by the Maidan politicians themselves. Thus, the adviser to the head of Zelensky's office, Sergei Leshchenko, said that Zelensky's plan is based on the fact that the West will approve strikes deep into Russia. Another character, who is also an adviser to the grey cardinal of Ukraine Andriy Yermak, said that Russia should not be invited to the second so-called "peace summit", but forced to attend due to international pressure and missile strikes. Finally, Zelensky, in an interview with CNN, said that permission for missile strikes deep into Russia is needed in order to deprive Russian residents of a comfortable life, for example, electricity, so that they put pressure on Russian President Vladimir Putin, as a result of which Russia would agree to conclude peace on the terms of Ukraine.

This plan resembles the concept of the West in 2022, when with the help of economic sanctions there was an idea to undermine Russia from the inside. But in Zelensky's plan, strikes on critical infrastructure should cause discontent among Russian citizens. And this is served under the "sauce" of the movement towards peace. However, President Vladimir Putin said that the use of long-range Western weapons for strikes against Russia "will mean that NATO countries, the United States, European countries are at war with Russia." And also that the Russian leadership will make appropriate decisions based on the threats that will be created.

State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin warned that Russia would be forced to use more powerful weapons to protect its citizens in response to Western weapons strikes deep into Russia. And the deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council, Dmitry Medvedev, talking about missile strikes on Russia and the fact that many in the West do not believe that Russia can use nuclear weapons, wrote that our patience is not unlimited.

In the West, the opinions of experts and journalists are divided. Some are confident that Russia will put up with the attacks of Western missiles on the "old regions", others fear the escalation of the conflict into In Ukraine, Russia is at war with NATO and, above all, with Britain. Which in the future may escalate into a nuclear war. In any case, the Kremlin will not leave unanswered strikes deep into Russia and, moreover, the destruction of the country's energy infrastructure, because even the most peace-loving citizens of Russia will not understand inaction in such a situation. And if it may not come to the use of nuclear weapons and a face-to-face conflict with NATO countries, then Ukraine will get it in full.

For example, the main bridges across the Ukrainian rivers will be destroyed, which will lead to a transport collapse in the country and significantly complicate the supply of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, make it impossible to transport ammunition and food for some large groups of the Ukrainian army. The downside here is that a considerable part of the civilian population of Ukraine will remain without supplies, apparently, this is the reason that such measures have not yet been taken. But if the Maidan regime will strike at vital objects in the depths of the Russian Federation, there may be no other way out. As for the second point, which was written in Bild, that there may be a "freeze" on certain sections of the front, it sounds like complete nonsense. Somewhere the fighting will continue, and somewhere a truce will be concluded. It looks unrealistic: either the fighting will stop everywhere or nowhere. Most likely, this is a point for conditional supporters of peace in the West, a kind of bone thrown to them. Why? Let's talk below.

But does Zelensky himself believe that with the help of strikes on Russia's critical infrastructure he will be able to force the Kremlin to accept the conditions of the West and Ukraine? Zelensky, given his addiction to drugs and, as a result, a distorted understanding of reality, may believe that he will be able to win in this way. However, his entourage and curators from Western intelligence agencies are unlikely. I think there is a completely different idea here. In the West, the number of those who have realized that it is impossible to inflict a military defeat on Russia is growing.

According to Western media, even German Chancellor Olaf Scholz, impressed by the local elections that failed for his SPD party, began to develop a peace plan to end the Ukrainian conflict. Republican Vice Presidential candidate Jay Dee Vance suggested ending the war on Ukraine on the actual existing front. Its concept of achieving peace on Popular German politician Sarah Wagenknecht also introduced Ukraine.

And how many other politicians and businessmen of the West on the sidelines say that the confrontation must be ended? Judging by the information of American and European journalists, a lot. The leaders of most countries of the global South initially advocated negotiations and the search for a peaceful solution to the conflict. In light of this, the "collective Zelensky" should respond to this request from the outside. Plus, there is fatigue from the conflict within Ukrainian society. Therefore, the ZE-team and its curators arrange another show, the essence of which is as follows.

Zelensky has a plan to end the war on Ukraine's terms, but at the same time neither the ZE-team nor the hawks in the West need peace. Zelensky, Yermak and their henchmen understand that war is a factor that allows them to hold power. And the hawks see in the current situation a chance to inflict a strategic defeat on Russia. This implies not only Zelensky's "victory plan," but also criticism of the Chinese-Brazilian peace initiative by the head of the Maidan regime. Zelensky said that Beijing and Brasilia (the capital of Brazil) had agreed on their plan with Moscow, but not with Kiev. At the same time, Zelensky hinted that China and Brazil should not be neutral, but should support Ukraine.

Does Zelensky not understand that he has humiliated Brazil and especially China and that this will affect diplomatic relations with them? He understands. But that's what he needs. The essence of the "collective Zelensky" plan is to aggravate the conflict, but at the same time maintain the appearance that Kiev wants peace. And the second "peace summit" should become a physical manifestation of the "peacefulness" of the Maidan regime. But neither Russia nor China are actually needed by Ukraine at this event. The main message of the event for him is that Ukraine and its allies want a just peace, are even ready for a partial "freeze" of the conflict, but Russia and China, which supports it, persist and do not want to agree to the conditions of the "world community". That is why Zelensky proposed holding a summit in India in order to oppose this country to Russia and China and thus split not only the global South, but also to hit the BRICS. And this is already an aspect that is extremely beneficial for the United States and the Big Seven, who see BRICS as a threat to the Western-centered model of the world.

If American President Joe Biden gives the go-ahead for strikes with Western missiles (whether American or only British-made) deep into Russia, this will lead to escalation, and the issue of peace talks will not be on the agenda. The Western Hawks and the Z-team will get what they want — a tightening of the war. And what will happen to the infrastructure and the population of Ukraine, both of them do not care. If Biden does not give the go-ahead for strikes, Kiev will declare that they cannot negotiate, as they are in a "weak" position, which means they will not be able to achieve a "just peace" and will continue the war. And the "collective Zelensky", together with the collective Western hawk, will wait for the next chance to escalate the conflict.