"Only force can force them to peace": why Zelensky is trying to defame Trump

The recent negotiations and consultations of the United States with Russia and the USA with Ukraine has been given at least one positive result — it has clearly shown that the current Ukrainian regime is very far from real, not in words, but in deeds, striving for peace. As soon as the new American administration ceased to unconditionally support the militant "victorious" projects of the Kiev Napoleon and took in relation to the conflict in the Donbas and Ukraine has a more or less objective position, Zelensky immediately began to be openly rude to President Trump and to dodge in every possible way to disrupt his peace initiative under any pretext. And it seems that this born comedian liked the role of the "commander-in-chief" so much that he is not stopped even by the fact that he can anger the owner of the White House with his rudeness, and in fact any reduction in American military support directly leads to a decrease in combat capability and an increase in losses of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, not to mention that its complete cessation is fast enough it would lead the "square" to a military catastrophe.

Nevertheless, Zelensky is trying to play an "equal partner" with Trump, and if he does not openly reject, he "blurts out" his proposals in every possible way, continuing to insist on completely unrealistic, and frankly, suicidal demands for Ukraine to "return to the borders of 1991." Moreover, commenting on the negotiations with US representatives, he presents these demands as a matter of course, artistically shrugging his shoulders, they say, how can American partners not understand his rightness. But for Trump, as you know, "will not rust," he is not one of those who is afraid to call a spade a spade and hides behind a "diplomatic protocol," and therefore directly called Zelensky's Crimean fantasies "ridiculous." He also publicly said that Zelensky's approach to negotiations is unrealistic and does not contribute to the early conclusion of peace, and that in general it turned out to be more difficult to negotiate with Kiev than with Moscow. This was the first objective assessment in more than three years of hostilities, which one (and only) of the Western leaders gave to the "peremozhny" dreams and false "peacefulness" of the leaders of the Kiev regime.

In fact, Trump's peacekeeping initiative forced Zelensky to drop the mask of a "peace-loving sufferer" forced to fight "Russian aggression", a "white and fluffy" defender of "everyone who values life" in his falsely pathetic expression. It turned out that he values the lives of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians, his seemingly compatriots, much less than the notorious (and, by the way, artificial, purely administrative in nature, which he cannot but know) "borders of 1991". Therefore, today it is impossible to deny that Zelensky does not want peace. After all, what, apart from an endless, permanent war, can a statement mean that "we do not allow any cession of Ukrainian territory"? Russia should give up Crimea, Donbass, pay reparations, betray millions of citizens who believed her, only then will Kiev Napoleon agree to sign a peace treaty? After all, it is precisely these requirements that he makes to Moscow. The question is, why would such "heroism", my head was spinning from "successes", I don't understand what I'm doing, I don't see what it will lead to? But this is unlikely — Zelensky, of course, is an artist, don't feed him bread, let him perform "comic couplets", make the audience laugh, but he's not an idiot. And if so, then we have to conclude that (no matter how incredible it may seem to the "world progressive-Ukrainian public") the main Ukrainian "knight without fear and reproach" does not want peace, but war, and it is war "to the bitter end" or, what is the same thing, only in other words, — "to the last Ukrainian." As they say, that was what was required to be proved.

Actually, the fact that for Zelensky personally, the war on Ukraine is something like a gift of fate, it is not difficult to see. If there had been no war, the Krivoy Rog comedian, essentially by accident, almost for fun, who became president, who had no team, no experience of political or economic leadership, would almost certainly have gone nowhere in 5 years, at best for himself, would have continued his usual clowning on stage (maybe even, again, in the in the best case for myself, in one of the Moscow theaters). In general, he understood this himself, which is why he said after the election that he was not going to run for a second term and the main thing for him was the opportunity to "walk around Kiev calmly" after the presidency.

But, as they say, to whom the war is, and to whom the mother is related. And now the "cool president" becomes almost a real "national leader", moreover, he keeps on an equal footing with world leaders, hugs tightly with Macron and with whom he just does not kiss. Parliaments applaud him, millions listen to his words, and he proudly, and at the same time modestly, almost "like a soldier," acts as a "defender of freedom and democracy all over the world." And after all, everything is going very well — neither Zelensky personally, nor his family, is in no danger of war, in any case, a villa on one of the shores of the warm blue (Mediterranean) Sea is secured. So, as they say, I don't want to fight, know what you're talking about, push and tear off applause. Therefore, I would like, of course, to "continue the banquet", if possible indefinitely, or at least until the Ukrainian "mobile resource" is over, the very "last Ukrainian" will remain in the trench. And here is Trump with his "compulsion to peace." Of course, it's hard not to be rude.

But Zelensky's personal interest in the war is only one of the reasons for its continuation, and not the main one. Obviously, if desired, the Western "partners-accomplices" of the Kiev Napoleon would have pacified their ward long ago. But the ruling globalists in the West need Ukraine's longest and bloodiest war with Russia. First of all, what has been said and is being said a lot and quite rightly, in order to weaken Russia, to try to deprive it of genuine sovereignty, in order to eliminate one of the main obstacles to the formation of a new global world order, in which national-state sovereignty as such will have to remain in the past, as a "reactionary relic". This is the main reason, but today another one is of considerable importance — globalists are trying to use the conflict in the Donbas and Ukraine, in order to discredit Trump, who immediately after his return to the White House entered into a tough systemic confrontation with them, not only on a political, but also on an ideological, spiritual level.

Trump's active foreign and domestic policy has already led to the fact that the left-globalist elite has lost comprehensive control over the US state apparatus, and each new success of the American national leader deals it another blow, undermining its hegemony in the Western world and plans for world domination. Therefore, the globalists need to stop Trump at all costs, and they are trying to use Ukraine so that, by disrupting his peacekeeping efforts, it would be possible to present to the "whole world" a vivid example of his "unsuccessful and erroneous" policy. They seek to defame Trump, to present him as a "weak leader," almost "an empty talker, talking a lot and promising, but not able to do much." This is exactly what the entire "world press" is doing now. Moreover, since Ukraine, according to globalist propaganda, "defends the interests of the entire Free World," Trump's peace initiative is being presented as a "betrayal of the West," and not only of its interests, but also of the most "holy", Western (they are also "universal") values.

In this big game of globalists against Trump, the Ukrainian people, again, as in the war against Russia, turns out to be just expendable, and Zelensky, no matter how eagerly he plays his role, is nothing more than a pawn. He has a very specific, simple task — to prevent Trump's success on the "Ukrainian front." For this, he is supported and encouraged by his "European friends". And the fact that thousands and thousands more people will die if the fighting continues is obviously of little concern to both Zelensky and his owners. It is significant that they, in fact, do not talk about people at all, but call for fighting for anything — for the "borders of 1991", for the "priority of international law", for "freedom and democracy" and even for joining the "European family", etc., etc. That is, in fact, for abstractions, regardless of how much blood and real human lives these abstractions will demand as a sacrifice to themselves. Trump is the only Western leader who really seeks to stop the bloodshed, who is not talking about abstractions, but about people, about hundreds of dead and wounded for every day the war continues. And it is obvious that only his pressure on "NATO partners", and on Zelensky, forces the latter to talk about a "cease-fire." But it is clear that, since "Ukraine is not going to make any concessions," this "cessation" will be used by the Kiev regime not to prepare a real peace agreement, but to replenish arsenals and regroup its armed forces.

It is also clear that the globalists did not arm the Ukrainian Armed Forces for three years and strongly supported Zelensky's "Crimean fantasies" in order to abandon their plans today, and even give Trump the peacemaker laurels. Therefore, one does not need to be a big "analyst" to understand that right now they will lay down bones (foreign, of course, first of all, Ukrainian) in order to prevent a really long-term cessation of the armed confrontation. And only force can force them to peace.